Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Channel Church

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 01:11, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Channel Church

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a single church/congregation established this year, no third-party references. Perhaps the only interesting fact beyond what could be said with minor modification for any other church is that it serves a Chinese community and its services are in Chinese. (That "the church is notable for the upbeat worship music, focused setting and friendly congregation" doesn't come close to meeting the notability guidelines.) Proposed deletion removed by creator. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 21:30, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Mike Rosoft. Geogene (talk) 00:27, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:31, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:31, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep requested instead because article has been edited based on feedback, with more interesting facts about the church. Chn3a (talk) 03:04, 21 February 2015 (UTC) — Chn3a (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG - nothing extraordinary about this church. St Anselm (talk) 10:11, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unfortunately. I looked in local newspaper indexes (Berkeley voice, SF Chronicle, and Oakland Tribune) and didn't find any references to this church. If there are articles in local Chinese language papers (which I am not able to search), then I might change my vote. LaMona (talk) 22:01, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:06, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nonotable church org, building apparently not notable.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 07:08, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Run-of-the-mill church, established only last month. My hunch is that they were setting up their social media sites and mistook Wikipedia for a social media site - not realizing that it is an international encyclopedia with inclusion standards. --MelanieN (talk) 21:41, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.