Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chantel Jeffries

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker^talk 15:50, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Chantel Jeffries

Chantel Jeffries (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Primary claim to fame is "...launching product lines of Draya, a character in Basketball Wives". Got arrested with Justin Bieber. I'm pretty sure we haven't achieved WP:BIO quite yet. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 02:01, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not notable. Can't see significant independent coverage. Being associated with notable people doesn't make you notable. Cowlibob (talk) 13:45, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:11, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:11, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:12, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:12, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or merge - Either keep the article, or merge and redirect to Justin_Bieber#Legal_issues. --Jax 0677 (talk) 19:32, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Hanging around notable people or having plans don't make you notable. Niteshift36 (talk) 01:38, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Wikipedia is not a tabloid news source. We do not need articles on everyone with Justin Bieder when he was arrested. At the rate he is going, soon that would be all Wikipedia is. OK, that might be an exaggeration, but we still do not need these articles.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:35, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.