Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Character appearances in Rome
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. east.718 at 05:41, November 24, 2007
- Character appearances in Rome (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Lacks notability, excessive list that is easily covered by mentioning appearances in the character articles. AnmaFinotera (talk) 02:59, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom. Not much notability. jj137 (Talk) 02:59, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Would be ridiculous even on the main page for the series. --- tqbf 04:06, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete much too detailed. JJL (talk) 04:51, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Wikipedia is not a directory. - Rjd0060 (talk) 05:07, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable enough for inclusion. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 10:14, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Hammer1980·talk 15:37, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This has nothing to do with notability. It just seems to be based on original research and it is little trouble to cover the information in the character or episode articles. - Mgm|(talk) 17:02, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not notable enough. Rudget.talk 17:56, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]- Keep - per my overview of jc37's comments. It could be useful when referring to the programme. Rudget.talk 19:25, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I think that since the series is more than somewhat based on history, I can rather see the use of such a table as a reference tool. And I don't see how this is any different than listing what characters appeared in an edipode. This just brings the information together in a useful table. (ease of use, navigation aid...) And in reading most comments above, I'd like to point to Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions#Just not notable : ) - jc37 (talk) 08:52, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. RMHED (talk) 17:21, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.