- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete as copyvio. No prejudice against a new, original version that demonstrates notability from reliable sources. Eluchil404 (talk) 17:57, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Charlie Kaye (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Biography of a behind the scenes broadcasting person. I don't believe he is notable to a general audience. If he were on-air or on a broadcasting version of Wiki he might be notable, but just because he has a high profile job doesn't make him notable to the average person. I think only broadcast people like Tom Brokaw, Dan Rather or other notable ON-AIR people are the only ones who should have pages. Also I believe major contributor to article is User:Dfmock who has been making many COI edits. The User:69.22.248.44 could be his. Just a hunch on that, but most importantly I find a one paragraph page about someone in the broadcasting field is not necessary. UWMSports (talk) 16:16, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Those are far from reliable sources other than the Hofstra.edu one. But that's sort of biased in its own right as he is an alumni of the school. Many non-notable people go back to their university to speak in the field they work in. By the way, my tax attorney will show up on a google search. That shouldn't make you notable. -UWMSports (talk) 21:57, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; I'm a broadcasting major and I've never heard of Charlie Kaye. Therefore he isn't notable. Hopefully he isn't reading this though, when I start looking for a job next Spring! -FancyMustard (talk) 16:01, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:COPYVIO of this. --Rosiestep (talk) 23:37, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete copyvio. Even if there were no copyright problems, there was no indication of any notoriety beyond that of the local level. B.Wind (talk) 04:27, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.