Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlie on Parole

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 21:10, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Charlie on Parole

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Charlie on Parole (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film, does not have significant coverage beyond trivial mentions in interviews and trailer listings, does not meet WP:NFP BOVINEBOY2008 16:25, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:40, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it has been previously PROD'd (via summary). --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:45, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No evidence of significant coverage in reliable sources. The only cited RS is to Vulture, which is all of one paragraph long. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 20:46, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for lacking broad independent coverage. Reference 1 is a one-on-one interview in a student newspaper. Reference 2 is a mention in a major entertainment media site but it's passing mention. Reference 3 is a mention in a one-man blog. Although the blog operator has some past legitimate journalistic credentials there's no editorial oversight. Blue Riband► 15:28, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.