Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chartered Development Finance Analyst

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:15, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chartered Development Finance Analyst

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

the Institute that delivers this certification is bien discussed for deletion at WP:Articles for deletion/Chartered Institute of Development Finance Domdeparis (talk) 18:34, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:05, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 20:54, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The institute that delivers this certification has had it's article deleted. This article has similar sourcing issues and suffers a fail under WP:GNG. TheCrazedBeast (talk) 21:22, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WP:GNG - Insufficient neutral secundary sources. All sources seem to be by involved institutes. I googled for news items containing this articles exact name and found 0 results. This should not be possible for a notable English language certification. -- Taketa (talk) 08:13, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 04:44, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:GNG. -- Dane ^talk 00:30, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.