- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 07:53, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non Notable wrestler. Darrenhusted 00:25, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletions. —Darrenhusted 00:32, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- KEEP Wikipedia should be inclusive not exclusive. I am a firm believer that most bios should be allowed to remain. All bios need is sources and a minimal standard of notability. The larger Wikipedia is the best of a resource it is. One million articles is much better that one hundred thousand articles. It should be a source of information on the most trivial matters to the most important.Callelinea 04:02, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay, so you don't like our notability criteria, no need to prove a point by trying to impose your criteria on debates where we use the actual criteria. This user has been spamming several debates with this BTW. Morgan Wick 07:39, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Does not hit the notability bar here. SirFozzie 16:22, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not really notable as a mid-range Florida indy wrestler/former TNA jobber, and it seems like Mister Saint Laurent is essentially the only editor of that article *and* tried to remove it from the list of AfD's. If that's all that needed to happen, I'd have done it a while ago, heh. --DanZero 20:47, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non-notable and poorly sourced. Nikki311 05:14, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.