Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaudhary Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (proclaim) @ 15:49, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Chaudhary Group

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Food industry company with dubious corporate notability as per lack of sources. Of the several sources presented most relate to its product Wai Wai, which interestingly does not have a page. If not deleted, an alternative could be to transform it to a Wai Wai article and the little information about the company may be added to the article of its president. Please participate at the discussion. Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 20:57, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:56, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:56, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The Forbes article on Binod Chaudhary (here) describes Chaudhary Group as including "a controlling stake in Nepal's Nabil Bank, a fast growing foods business best known for instant noodle brand Wai Wai and a string of hotels in Asia and more recently, in Africa where in a joint venture with Uganda's Mukwano group he's building hotels in Uganda, Rwanda and Burundi. Last year, CG diversified into telecom when it bought out ST Telecom, a rural telecom operator." That sounds notable to me. Worth remembering that an English-language Google search is a poor indicator of notability for a Nepalese corporation.
The nominator has since been blocked as the sockpuppet of a permanently-banned editor and is thus unlikely to expand on his deletion rationale. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 05:27, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 07:40, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: per User:Suriel1981 -- Ascii002 (talk · contribs · guestbook) 00:56, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - meets WP:COMPANY. Seems to be a worthy topic for an article. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 11:16, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.