Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chea Vesley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:51, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chea Vesley

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Chea Vesley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced BLP, the subject has never played in a fully professional league thus failing WP:NFOOTY. I do not see correspondence to WP:GNG either. Ymblanter (talk) 11:51, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:05, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:05, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:05, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:58, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. Tropicanan (talk) 11:40, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 13:19, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – obvious NFOOTY fail, doesn't meet GNG, no references in the article, no sources to be found. Articles like this should be A7. Players who haven't yet played a game in a non-professional league (even if it's the top league in their country) shouldn't be considered "significant" or "important" for A7 purposes. Leviv ich 03:48, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.