- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —Kurykh 22:33, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Without any reliable sources, this is original research. The talk page seemed to address concerns about this article, which is why it is here. The article itself is speculative, unsourced and therefore does not fit criteria for inclusion. the_undertow talk 06:23, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete Unencyclopedic and per nom. - Cyborg Ninja 06:37, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- All it deserves is a metion in List of shock sites. Delete. Will (talk) 06:59, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- D per nom. This should not be in Wikipedia. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 09:22, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Oli Filth 10:21, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletions. -- the wub "?!" 11:04, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.