Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Checkbox compliance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 17:15, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Checkbox compliance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article is a definition of a seldom-used neologism. It has no references, and I can't find any examples of it being used with the given meaning (although the phrase "checkbox compliance" is sometimes used in another context in quality assurance). Colapeninsula (talk) 14:07, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I forgot to add, it has also been transferred to Wiktionary[1]. --Colapeninsula (talk) 14:09, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:36, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOTDICT. – Pnm (talk) 21:39, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NEO. Speaking as someone who has to work with compliance a lot, it may well be that in the future such an article is justified. But right now it is a neologism, and the usual rule is we delete 'em. I don't see any reason to depart from the usual rule. --Legis (talk - contribs) 05:21, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.