Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheeseman the Game

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to SuperTux. Clear consensus that this topic is not notable on its own, but redirects are very cheap. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 05:55, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cheeseman the Game

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not established, no reliable sources given. Article was already deleted once in WP:PROD. -- intgr [talk] 12:55, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This article is worded too kindly about the game itself. I can't see why the game is important, it belongs on a forum spam thread. --MrRatermat2 (talk) 13:42, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Looks spammy and non-notable to boot. Peridon (talk) 17:51, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect as a spinoff(?) of SuperTux. Ivanvector (talk) 19:54, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 00:01, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:01, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 03:41, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 23:05, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect as above, per articles and independent reviews: [1][2] [3] [4] There are others, and many video reviews which I have not posted here. After removing the spammy bits from the article not enough will be left to keep a separate article, so merge into SuperTux. Ivanvector (talk) 00:41, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 02:32, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The only available sources seem to be minor, closely affiliated sources. Fails WP:GNG notability. - Mr X 02:45, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.