- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:24, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable,vanity,npov vio Shafta 19:27, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- This AFD nomination was originally started by 64.5.88.47 who may or may not be Shafta (though I'm guessing it is). Yomanganitalk 19:33, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Musaabdulrashid 23:33, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - non-notable, looks like spam. BTLizard 11:43, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Chegg is valid and has a number of press sources online backing it.
- Keep - Chegg seems to be legit. Large number of users, wide geographic spectrum. --216.165.126.107 16:04, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mangojuicetalk 15:30, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep - Looks like they know where their towel is - Richfife 15:34, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails web.--Peta 05:37, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a failure of WP:WEB and also WP:CORP.--Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 01:22, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.