Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheng Rotation Vane CRV

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:07, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cheng Rotation Vane CRV

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot establish notability by looking for "Cheng Rotation Vane" at Google News and Scholars. -- Crowsnest (talk) 15:05, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete A decade-old item that doesn't seem to have made much of a splash in the long run. It's hard not to conclude that the highly promotional article was made on behalf of the manufacturer, as evidenced by all the OTRS tags for presumably corporate-supplied images. Mangoe (talk) 00:09, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:24, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The same editor created a number of articles related to Dah Yu Cheng—all of them having the same problems. Dah Yu Cheng article is nominated for deletion but probably also Cheng cycle and CLN (technology) should be nominated. Beagel (talk) 11:59, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Cheng cycle is a real thing that shows up in the literature; however the self-promotional character of the article is an issue. I'm heading over to WP:COI/N now. Mangoe (talk) 13:37, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - non-notable and spammy. ukexpat (talk) 14:29, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.