Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cherise Sinclair
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:53, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Cherise Sinclair (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:BLP of a writer, not reliably sourcing any strong claim to passing WP:AUTHOR. The notability claim here is that she won minor literary awards that aren't highly meganotable enough to confer an "inherent" notability freebie in the absence of passing WP:GNG on the sourcing -- but the only footnotes here are those awards' own self-published websites about themselves, rather than any evidence of media coverage about them or her. Bearcat (talk) 08:51, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 08:51, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete clearly not enough sourcing ot justify an article on a writer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:18, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:17, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.