Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chess as mental training

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was MERGE. Alan.ca 01:56, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chess as mental training

Delete: Information belongs in article chess. There are lots of things which are good for mental training: academic fields, puzzles, sports, music. That is no reason we should make a new article. Neither should this page be a redirect, as it an improbable search phrase. JianLi 01:01, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Chess. Notable, verifiable information, but it doesn't stand well on its own. --Wafulz 02:38, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Essay.--ZayZayEM 02:41, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge any usable information to Chess. As it is, its an essay. Hello32020 02:45, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep or merge per Hello32020.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 14:32, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep or Merge-The page title itself sounds like a section name, but the main Chess article is big. So, either try to fit it, or make a section in the chess article with the "Main article" link. --TeckWiz ^ParlateContribs_@(Lets go Yankees!) 17:23, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge, the article alone shows no notability. Usable information from this article in conjunction with information in the chess article would be nice. --Cremepuff222 (talk, review me!) 22:36, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge, seems to be useful content but no reason for it to be independent of the Chess article, even as long as it is already. Goodnightmush 23:26, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Rename and rewrite There's some good raw information. A good system of reorganizing would be to rename to Psychology (of/and) chess, referencing Hartston and Wason's book The Psychology of Chess. Another option would be "Chess (and/in) education." YechielMan 15:24, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge article's notability is not supported (not to mention broad brush statements). A couple of lines in chess would pull the concept of this one up in a flash.--VS ^talk 12:34, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.