Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chicano/a Movement in Washington State History Project

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Seattle Civil Rights and Labor History Project. — Mr. Stradivarius on tour ^{(have a chat)} 02:36, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Chicano/a Movement in Washington State History Project

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a borderline case, but I think it should be deleted or merged into Seattle Civil Rights and Labor History Project because it doesn't seem to have attracted much independent notice in reliable secondary sources and does not inherit notability from its parent project per WP:NWEB and WP:N. Batard0 (talk) 17:05, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - This is the first time I've seen the ridiculous use of a slash to create a brand new PC multi-gender Spanish word. This is really pretenciosa/o and the the title needs to be changed if this closes a keep. Carrite (talk) 18:15, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I had exactly the same thought, but it appears that is actually the literal name of the project (see the link). •••Life of Riley (T–C) 01:55, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - To Seattle Civil Rights and Labor History Project. Insufficient independent sourcing to support a GNG case for a free-standing page. Highly unlikely search term. Carrite (talk) 18:20, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 17:39, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with an article on its subject matter. I doubt that the acadmic project warrants an article, but something on it might be appended to an article on what it is studying. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:58, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.