Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chickenfoot (software)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:50, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Chickenfoot (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable Firefox extension. It's not even in the official repository. Damiens.rf 17:55, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. A quick search turned up no substantial coverage in reliable sources. Article contains no claim of notability. --Pnm (talk) 23:39, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan Talk Contributions 00:07, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete found a cnet article but there wasn't much else. Noom talk contribs 21:51, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.