Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/China Association for Science and Technology
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawn by nominator
AfDs for this article:
- China Association for Science and Technology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Organisation fails to meet WP:N, having only self links. Initial searches provide no additional evidence of notability, with mentions in passing at most, and the article is unlikely to be improved.
I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reasons:
- Dakshina Kannada Rationalist Association (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Kerala Yukthivadi Sangham (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Science and Rationalists' Association of India (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Tarksheel Society (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Irish Skeptics Society (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Föreningen Vetenskap och Folkbildning (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Sociedade Brasileira de Céticos e Racionalistas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Indian Rationalist Association (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Sociedade da Terra Redonda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Artw (talk) 14:38, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. These organizations appear to be unrelated. I think they need to be evaluated on an individual basis, not to be lumped together like this. — Rankiri (talk) 15:01, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It's a fair point - CAST is actually a bit of an odd man out there. I'll seperate the others out into their own AfD. Artw (talk) 15:50, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- And in fact the news archive search is throwing uop much better results for CAST than the straight google news search, so I will be withrawing the nomination.
- It's a fair point - CAST is actually a bit of an odd man out there. I'll seperate the others out into their own AfD. Artw (talk) 15:50, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.