Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chinese MP4 player

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 02:48, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese MP4 player (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Longstanding content fork of portable media player with a hazy definition of its subject matter and a predisposition to be critical. All the good bits have now been merged to more appropriate articles. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 12:57, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep-I see very little reasons to delete this page. It is clearly shown in the Portable media player#Controversy section that this article is a part of the entire media player section. A content fork an article that is created from another version of a said article. In other words, it is copied from another existing article. In this case, the article is merely a subpage. There is no violation of the content forking policy. --Zacharycrimsonwolf 13:53, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Cannot see any reason to delete this either. --neonwhite user page talk 14:36, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Seems like an expanded version of a smaller section within another article. No real reason to delete. Celarnor ^{Talk to me} 16:43, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Problematic, but yes, it's a Keeper This article used to have bits of info that had nothing to do with the article in question, but are general specifications of portable media players, like Chris Cunningham said (whom he helpfully copied to Portable media player & was drastically polished by all of us) It was only a matter of months later when I recently decided to remove those bits, as well as any original research and opinionated content from the article. I find even less reason to delete this article since the recent cleanup. Citations and external links support this article, and since the info isn't relevant to the main PMP article, it deserves an article of its own. --Jw21/PenaltyKillah 19:31, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.