Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chinese squabble

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 20:04, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

nn vanity advertising pschemp | talk 07:14, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete nn ad of a card game, written as such, and probably is a copyvio or text dump.ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! 07:18, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete advert. Most content self admittedly copied from a news paper article "2003-11-08 / Taiwan News, Contributing Writer / By Tim Bullins" could be copyvio.--blue520 07:38, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, ad, nn. --Terence Ong 13:55, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete per WP:CV. Danny Lilithborne 01:04, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per blue520 Funky Monkey 01:19, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.