Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chip Talk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Dave Ross. ✗plicit 01:16, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Chip Talk

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Chip Talk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a radio show, not properly sourced as passing inclusion criteria for radio shows. The attempted notability claim here is that it's "the longest-running computer-related broadcast program on the air", but there's no source shown to verify that, or anything else either -- the only "reference" present in the article at all is the external link to the self-published website of the show's host, but it doesn't contain any content verifying any of this either, and is instead just an archive of a handful of radio comedy clips rather than anything related to computers.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt it from having to have proper WP:GNG-worthy referencing. Bearcat (talk) 02:35, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Washington. Bearcat (talk) 02:35, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:17, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Dave Ross, its founder, as an ATD. Jclemens (talk) 06:02, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Is there any more support for a possible Merge?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:48, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Dave Ross, as I don't think there's really any reliably sourced content worth merging. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 17:16, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Dave Ross: there are no significant coverages, good for redirect. AgerJoy talk 17:51, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.