- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 03:08, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Chip Walbert (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a member of a (maybe marginally) notable band, and of several non-notable bands. His notability does not extend beyond Where Fear and Weapons Meet (which itself probably does not meet the notability requirements), and he doesn't warrant a separate article. I am undecided about nominating the band; I will watch the discussion on this article before making a decision one way or the other. Horologium (talk) 18:19, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep automatically notable as member of two bandsDelete for lack of standalone notability no matter how many bands he's been in. (Do you get the feeling that I think criterion #6 of WP:BAND is stupid?) Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 18:28, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 00:46, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to his band Where Fear and Weapons Meet, no individual notability. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:50, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I agree that WP:MUSIC criterion 6 creates too much of an open door to notability by association, but it does make some sense, as it allows for the fact that no single redirect target is appropriate. Phil Bridger (talk) 22:21, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:44, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.