Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chip spice (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:32, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chip spice

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously nominated for deletion but kept. The impression I get from reading that discussion is that most of those who voted to keep did so on the understanding that reliable sources to satisfy the notability criteria would be found. Eleven months on and that doesn't seem to have been possible. I've had a quick search and not been able to find much so I think this isn't notable according to WP:N. Adambro (talk) 10:38, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:30, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No sources cited in the article, despite plenty of time to find them, and no evidence of notability found elsewhere. (In the previous AfD discussion three of the four editors saying "keep" explicitly said that they were saying so to give more time to find sources.) JamesBWatson (talk) 20:28, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - It's a stub, there is no references or external links, I couldn't find anything on chip spice on Google and it doesn't describe it well. Whenaxis (talk) 11:16, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.