- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:35, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Dictionary definiton. Regardless of how much text has been added, this article exists only to define this term. It's also unreferenced and NPOV. eaolson 22:46, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete es tonto, vato. ¡Orale! Danny Lilithborne 23:04, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom - sending it to wiktionary would be too cruel, it's not even a complete definition. Yomangani 23:10, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. foreign term not used in English. --Svartalf 03:05, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete because it can't be more than a dictionary definition, but saying that it's not used in the English-speaking world is untrue. English-language papers directed toward a Latin/Hispanic/whatever-term-you-prefer population will use the term as described. GassyGuy 22:36, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.