- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Tim Vickers 16:45, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Chloride shift (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
This is borderline unintelligible. It's been deleted once by me as such, but a new single purpose account reposted it. Guy (Help!) 12:07, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Could someone link this to Hamburger's Phenomenon??
- Keep for now A Google search leads me to believe that this is indeed worthy of an article, though it certainly needs a ton of work. What is your rationale for deletion? faithless (speak) 13:09, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I'll go and try and make it somewhat intelligible right now. Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) - Review me! 13:16, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - The article may be a stub, but this is genuine science. Runch 13:43, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletions. -- the wub "?!" 13:47, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I'm not a biologist or a doctor, but I think I've bridged the coherence gap with a slight tweek. --Evb-wiki 14:34, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep unclear writing is not a reason for deletion. The topic is notable. --Itub 14:40, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Cmt - How would one know if the topic is notable, if the article is not readable? --Evb-wiki 14:48, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- By a trivial web search for "chloride shift", or even better a book search or a Google Scholar search. --Itub 14:55, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Cmt - How would one know if the topic is notable, if the article is not readable? --Evb-wiki 14:48, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It's a medical term in common usage [1] [2] [3] [4]as a moment's research would have shown. Nick mallory 15:02, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.