The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC(talk) 14:09, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chocheng (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article does not have enough sources and has a promotional tone. The brand has some sources online but the designer does not. Fails GNG Vinegarymass911 (talk) 23:32, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 23:32, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 23:32, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 23:32, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 23:32, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.