Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chocolate santa effect

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 05:30, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chocolate santa effect (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable model used to explain supply and demand. Likely only used in the textbook cited. Google search yielded zero results. SharkxFanSJ (talk) 04:09, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, So this is the type of "quality research" our tax dollars are funding. "HIGH"er Learning indeed. Not quite notable enough to be recognized as anything but a holiday amusement effect. -- OlEnglish ^(Talk) 04:36, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not-notable WP:NEO. This is normally called seasonal demand although the example purports to illustrate something else and does not. Drawn Some (talk) 05:28, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, this is pretty clearly a one-off neologism. --Kuzaar^-T-C- 14:19, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.