- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:29, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- NB, I've made Chris bustin into a redirect - closing admin please delete it if this article is deleted.--Docg 16:10, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It was "No consensus" last time, but after this AFD can I request that we reconsider. Mr Bustin is no more notable, nor more likely to be actually elected than Mr Cooper. Mais oui! 14:12, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom--Docg 14:19, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Candidate received 12% of the vote in what I believe to be the equivalent of a city election here in the States. Also, what about this article. Same guy, less information. Should they both go? --Cyrus Andiron 15:40, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - He was a candidate for our national election, equivalent to a US House election and this is for the Scottish parliament so it is equivalent to an election to a US state legislature. TerriersFan 00:55, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- I don't think that likelihood of being elected should be considered, as you never know- the Scottish Conservatives may win a landslide vote and win the election! However, we should wait till that actually happens before we create an article for him. Astrotrain 16:22, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- "Chris is a member of the Constitutional Monarchy Association" is enough for me to say Delete as well! --MacRusgail 17:01, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.