Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian privilege

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep; nomination has been withdrawn and there are no outstanding delete !votes. Non-admin closure. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 02:09, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Christian privilege

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Falls under WP:SOAP item 2 is mostly opinion, although backed by sources article is written in a style that precludes any basis of privilige for non-christian denominations Amortias (T)(C) 18:07, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator On advice of comments will attempt cleanup - if someone can close would be appreciated — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amortias (talk • contribs) 22:47, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Yes, it is the opinion of numerous notable figures, cited in reliable sources, that Christian privilege exists. Thus, the topic is notable. If the article is biased, that is a reason to clean up the article: opinions should be rewritten in the voices of their sources. For example: "Jules diBigname stated Christians always get the front row tickets." Not "Jules diBigname observed Christians always get the front row tickets." The first is diBigname's notable opinion, the second is WP:SOAP. AfD is not for cleanup. - SummerPhD (talk) 18:57, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This issue/concept is quite important, any neutrality issues can be cleaned up later. Staglit (talk) 21:33, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.