Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christianity Explored (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Singularity 01:15, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Christianity Explored (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
This article asserts no notability for the subject which is essentially the same as its notable "cousin" the Alpha course. Essentially, the article is working as an advertisement for the course. This is the second time this article has been AfDed. What's more, the people and organizations associated with this particular course have been recently deleted for notability reasons:
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Good Book Company
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Thornborough --Nondistinguished 15:09, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Why is this course important enough to have an article? If someone edits the article to assert some notability, I'll reconsider. Vadder 16:21, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I didn't even know that Wiki did courses. Definitely not notable. Can anything be merged to the Alpha article though?Silver seren 17:35, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not significant. Note that this is not the same article as was previously deleted; it just happens to have the same name. Neil ム 22:19, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- merge/redirect Now that I've seen it, I agree this doesn't deserve its own article, but it seems similar/related enough it could be merged to Alpha course. --Random832 22:29, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Let a church group handle the promotion of this course. Did St. Paul use Wikipedia to spread the gospel? (Answer: no) Mandsford 23:50, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It reeks of an advertisement. --Farix (Talk) 14:19, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. The article does not assert notability, has no reliable sources, appears to be little more than an electronic tract table, and can not "inherit" the notability of a famous forebear, the Alpha Course. Bearian 02:39, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Notability issues. Brusegadi 05:45, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.