Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christina Rahm Cook

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:39, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Christina Rahm Cook

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Christina Rahm Cook (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks all actual notability, sources are press releases, paid-for articles, passing mentions, not independent, sale listings, ... This may look like an independent good source, but it is the "magazine" from Elysian, a luxury brand which organised the very show they are reporting on, so not an independent source after all. Fram (talk) 07:44, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Businesspeople. Fram (talk) 07:44, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom - I first came here to contest but it is clear to me the nomination is correct and justified. Also of note is that the books authored are self-published. Dorsetonian (talk) 07:57, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: This is lack of notable impact. CastJared (talk) 08:20, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, original submission was primarily fabricated sources; seo blog "guest posts" with fake authors and brand paid placement. Details of the subject shift depending on the press; seems to just be a self-published "author" that frequently self-promotes. Researching other potential sources through searches reveals no other reliable material, although there are lawsuits and MLM claims. Sam Kuru (talk) 12:35, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:40, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.