- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. BigDom 16:56, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Chrome Editor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable software product. Author contested prod. OSborn arfcontribs. 21:10, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- OSborn arfcontribs. 21:11, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 13:50, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- as above, no reliable coverage in 3rd party sources. Possible advert. Dialectric (talk) 14:16, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: I have copied the below comment from the article talk page: -- Whpq (talk) 18:58, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This software is rather new I understand but has the large user base and links from well known websites cnet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingbean1 (talk • contribs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.