Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chrystold Chetty
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy deletion as self-promotion Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:19, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Chrystold Chetty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Recommend deletion. Appears to be self written. NO references, no formatting or wikilinks and doesn't seem to meet notability. Kumioko (talk) 21:48, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep - numerous news articles and mentioned in two books establish notability, however the article does need to be rewritten. If not rewritten, WP:BLOWITUP - current article is not encyclopedic. GregJackP Boomer! 02:47, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.