- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 08:42, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Chubby Parade (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable website, but asserts notability. Is one of the premium websites in its field, not a speedy. Porollostracuos (talk) 23:17, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- comment Had viewed the article, agree it's not a speedy. I would like to hear what a consensus what have to say. cf38talk 23:19, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I agree that this is not a speedy, but this site fails WP:WEBSITE in that there is no sources or reliable third party publication that make this site notable. Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I also believe that no sources make this article fail WP:NOTGUIDE #3 (internet guides) in that there are no details on the website's achievements backed up by a reliable source. Beano (talk) 23:58, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:37, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - there is no coverage in reliable sources to establish notability -- Whpq (talk) 16:25, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.