- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. v/r - TP 17:55, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Chuen Yan Cheng (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This man's sole claim to fame is the development of the men's birth control pill. The rest of the article, until I went through it, was full of unsourced puffery.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 07:41, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Adjudin (the drug in question). Mangoe (talk) 13:42, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 21:02, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 21:02, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep That;s a sufficient claim to fame. He has apparently won some awards for it, and been covered in a substantial way by reliable sources. DGG ( talk ) 22:11, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep meets WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:27, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Clearly a notable person; the article needs a lot of work though! - The Bushranger One ping only 00:10, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.