Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chug (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to List of dog hybrids. ~ mazca talk 17:25, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Chug (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Much better as delete deleted or merged into the dog article Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 21:02, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or Merge Not notable enough to be it's own article.Abce2|Aww nuts!Wribbit!(Sign here) 21:04, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 18:14, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into List of dog hybrids. It's not notable on its own, but it can be merged. Exert 01:25, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into List of dog hybrids. The breed is mentioned in various news articles as well as dog breed sites, but not enough to build an article beyond a stub level. -SpacemanSpiffCalvin‡Hobbes 03:05, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merging to List of dog hybrids seems like the logical solution. –Juliancolton | Talk 03:20, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.