Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cian Maciejewski

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. I think from the sources in the article and those presented here that there is just about enough for GNG. Fenix down (talk) 23:06, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cian Maciejewski

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD removed. Fails WP:GNG and N:FOOTBALL (having never played in a fully professional league or for a senior international team). Dougal18 (talk) 17:02, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:18, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:18, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:18, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:18, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 18:22, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, does not meet any Wikipedia guideline. Geschichte (talk) 18:58, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 20:08, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - just about passes GNG albeit not for her football career [1] [2] [3] [4] Spiderone 16:38, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC. N:FOOTY and its essay is inadequate for players in top women's football (soccer) leagues around the world. Hmlarson (talk) 01:14, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unfortunately there's not quite enough out there to write an article on her sports career, and I don't think her TV competition career is notable (Ninja warrior contestants are typically not notable.) SportingFlyer T·C 10:34, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak~~ Keep - seems to pass GNG for the reasons given by Spiderone. The football career in my view just brings her over the line for notability. Deus et lex (talk) 09:29, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NFOOTY failure. Number 5 7 20:50, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect No solid reason has been given to justify the deletion of this content while valid alternatives exist. If she is not worthy of a standalone article this can be redirected somewhere. duffbeerforme (talk) 14:07, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not entirely convinced by the claims to GNG, I'm not very familiar with the csources so difficult to judge how significant htis coverage is. Disagree that a redirect is a useful outcome here - to what would this person be redirected to? However, no clear consensus to delete or keep so worth keeping open to discuss the sources noted.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fenix down (talk) 17:45, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I found sources relating to her football career in Gale (originally written in The Canberra Times) [5][6][7][8] This, combined with the sources posted by Spiderone (excluding the now.nine source, as Channel 9 broadcasts American Ninja Warrior so they are not independent,) causes this person to have enough notability to pass WP:GNG. Z1720 (talk) 01:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - as per the soures found by Z1720 I have upgraded my !vote above to Keep. Deus et lex (talk) 09:59, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Spiderone and Z1720.Passes WP:GNG though it fails WP:NFOOTY.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:23, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.