Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cinematech

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of programs broadcast by G4#Original 4. (non-admin closure) Devonian Wombat (talk) 23:55, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cinematech

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Cinematech (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NTV. I could find any sources that show that notability is met. Prod was declined for technical reasons. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 15:42, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 15:42, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination, can only find passing mentions of it in RS. Storchy (talk) 16:01, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ‡ El cid, el campeador ^talk 16:03, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to List of programs broadcast by G4#Original 3 where it is already listed. I was also unable to find anything but the most trivial mentions of the program, but a redirect to the proper list would be an appropriate WP:ATD. Rorshacma (talk) 18:49, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirecting to List of programs broadcast by G4#Original 4 seems like an acceptable deletion alternative. When I checked, it seems that it would be "#Original 4" rather than 3, but principally as a target, it seems appropriate. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:31, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.