Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cinematic immersion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 09:55, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cinematic immersion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Neologism / non-notable counseling method. Appears to be used by Warren Farrell and nobody else. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 01:54, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I declined the CSD because it wasn't an obvious candidate, but...while there was some notability asserted, it isn't actually supported by reliable sources.  Frank  |  talk  02:13, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Delete Most of the references offered are indirectly related at best. No third-party non-trivial reliable sources that I could locate. -Senseless!... says you, says me 05:12, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• I tagged the parent article as an advert and I think it needs radical pruning. But I have to say I think a speedy merge and redirect is the way to go. Whether it's just a mention or a paragraph or whatever can be verifiably sourced it seems like given the parent article it can be included there. ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:13, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • By "parent article" you mean Warren Farrell. A redirect there would be acceptable to me. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 06:10, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - CrapYourname (talk) 22:30, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  Please see WP:IDL.  Frank  |  talk  16:33, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.