Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Circumpolar Health Bibliographic Database

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:30, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Circumpolar Health Bibliographic Database (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

non notable database. Google hit 324. Anef00 (talk) 07:04, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. The databaser has been published about in an important journal in its field. You need more than just Google hits to prove this is not noteworthy. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:41, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep adequate references. WP is not a google hit counter. DGG (talk) 03:15, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Has high-quality sources that show notability. Phil Bridger (talk) 12:36, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.