- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:32, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod. Appears to be notability issues. Procedural nom, no opinion. UsaSatsui 20:21, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable. Only 3 known showings of the art, and no sources other than official sites. Tx17777 20:30, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. —David Eppstein 00:03, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unattributed and seems to be non-notable. Carlosguitar 00:14, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not widely represented in exhibitions according to article. Fails WP:BIO. --Alksub 01:53, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all above. Johnbod 19:36, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all above. --Biblbroks's talk 06:28, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Obscurity is asserted, but not notability. - Dean Wormer 03:54, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.