Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cirrus jet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn by nominator per WP:SNOW. --NMChico24 21:27, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cirrus jet (discussion|history|protect|delete|undelete|logs|links)

This jet is still in the design phase with an undetermined release date and even undetermined specs. Borders on advertising, and is at best a "crystal ball" article about a product which doesn't even exist yet. NMChico24 17:36, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep This company has plans to build this aircraft and even the announcement is affecting the market, whether it is built or not. I vote it should stay. Ahunt 18:04, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • If you could add references supporting this, that would greatly help. --NMChico24 18:05, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Sure - this aircraft under development has its own website describing the product and taking orders for it. Ahunt 18:09, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • I was actually requesting references from reliable, notable publications not related to the company itself, so that the product's notability and the effect on the market you mentioned can be established. Otherwise, the article is merely advertising a product. --NMChico24 18:13, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
        • If you want independently reported information on this proposed aircraft then have a look at these stories on the independent aviation news source AvWeb [1] [2] [3] Ahunt 19:29, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The article just needs improvement. I've done a little cleanup already that hopefully helps. -- Renesis (talk) 18:20, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Needs clean up and sources, not deletion. --Falcorian ^(talk) 19:36, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Needs to be cleaned up, shouldn't be deleted though. Hello32020 19:59, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, and cleanup, needs to be improved further. References can be added to the article. --Terence Ong _{(C | R)} 20:05, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.