Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cisco Unified Provisioning Manager
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 05:17, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Cisco Unified Provisioning Manager (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
AFD - concern = No assertion of notability, no secondary sources. 65.242.18.131 (talk) 11:06, 12 August 2012 (UTC) - discussion page created on behalf of IP by Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:44, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: though I found some mention, the sources are either primary or lack depth of coverage. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 12:48, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSpecialUser TSU 00:20, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:GNG. LibStar (talk) 00:47, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:V and WP:N - LES 953 (talk) 06:24, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.