Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citizens Unity of India

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 05:16, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Citizens Unity of India

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I previously placed a Prod on this article with the rationale "No evidence that this is a notable organisation." The Prod was removed without comment by the article creator, whose editing history has a focus on the organisation and its founder, whose biography is also at AfD. I see minimal evidence of this party having a tangible existence: there is a bare-bones Webs free site with no evidence of activity; Google turns up a Youtube official ad (13 views) and a Facebook page (251 likes). So I am bringing it to AfD on the same rationale as the earlier Prod. AllyD (talk) 12:00, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and the related AfD. Wizardman 15:27, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, a vanity stunt, not a real party. And this has been deleted before, btw (but under a slightly different name). --Soman (talk) 20:21, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Not a real party. Only search result is this Wiki page and a facebook page.--Vigyani_talk^{ਯੋਗਦਾਨ} 12:05, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Social media tittle-tattle best ignored.- Zananiri (talk) 12:59, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.