Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Classic 100 Countdowns (ABC)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. — Coffee // have a cup // essay // 03:28, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Classic 100 Countdowns (ABC) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable, and possible copyright vio. Almost entire article is a copy of the list on the Australian Broadcasting Corporation website.
- Delete There is nothing notable about these lists. Many classical stations have exercises of this kind, e.g. Classic FM (UK) which has been running five years longer than the ABC one and has attracted independent coverage in the UK. The only coverage I've found for the ABC lists is by the station itself. Voceditenore (talk) 16:41, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep for the reasons detailed at the Classic 100 Original delete discussion page. I find the reasoning for the deletion of this page even stranger than the reasons proffered for the deletion of the individual countdown pages. This page acts as a miniature summary of just the top entries in each countdown. As a tertiary source, summarising information is what WP does best. What possible copyright violation could be involved? GFHandel. 20:36, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep for reasons detailed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Classic 100 original (ABC). -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 02:52, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Based on the covereage I have provided on the AFDs of some of the individual polls and their related cds and concerts. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:12, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.