Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Client Access to Integrated Services and Information

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 01:14, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Client Access to Integrated Services and Information

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ephemeral endeavour existence of which not supported by any independent sources; appears to have achieved nothing Sirlanz (talk) 13:24, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:28, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:48, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'm able to find a lot of primary source verification that this exist(s/ed) — but I am not able to find any evidence of reliable source coverage about it to demonstrate or document that it had a noteworthy or significant impact on anything. Bearcat (talk) 14:29, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.