- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Fabrictramp | talk to me 16:01, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Cliff Numark (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Nonnotable person, fails WP:BIO. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 16:53, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Nom (not to mention that based on today's changes, it would require a lot of work just to get out of the WP:PEACOCK category). Dori (Talk • Contribs) 22:09, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:22, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:23, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Nom - not notable and unhelpful article on living individual Victuallers (talk) 19:25, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete has some local notability but not enough to meet WP:NOTE. RMHED (talk) 00:15, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.