Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clock (computing)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Clock signal. (non-admin closure) Rcsprinter (talk) 18:11, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Clock (computing) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
contested prod and wikipedia is not a manual The Elves Of Dunsimore (talk) 04:26, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- redirect — I recommend redirection to Clock signal. I agree that a description of the command is not something for Wikipedia, but the concept of "clock" in computing is relevant and the technical equivalent of the colloquial term would be either "clock signal" or perhaps clock generator. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 05:16, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- redirect I agree with redirect to Clock signal. - Bkid Talk/Contribs 05:52, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — Osubuckeyeguy (talk) 17:07, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete the article now is the manual page for a C programming language function, little to do with the hardware signal concept. Library functions are not notable, so just delete. No sources anyway, and perhaps a copyright violation of cut-n-paste. Does not even mention what library it as in, when defined, etc. W Nowicki (talk) 17:59, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.