Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CloudTest

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:40, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CloudTest

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

CloudTest (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This promotional brochure about a non-notable computer application is sourced only to product directories and blogs, some of which seem to have been deadlinks for quite a while. I have been unable to find anything better. Reyk _YO! 23:21, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:35, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (but weakly) - Per nom., I believe this fails WP:GNG. I can't find any reliable sources although I do find plenty of promotional material. I also found a s security alert regarding multiple vulnerabilities. The article itself is in a very poor state and should at the very least be draftified. It is not ready for mainspace. It is unsourced and the barest of stubs. Yet WP:NEXIST says that the standard for deletion is that no sources exist, not that there are none in the article. It is possible that sources exist that I did not find. Should another editor turn up actual reliable sources demonstrating notability (not just promotional material or sources like the security alert that confirm existence but not notability) then I would be content to have my view interpreted as draftify. -- Sirfurboy (talk) 10:24, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom fails WP:GNG .Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:07, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.